Conv/Prot separate in IEA but same in date/parties/UNTS
Legal matters;Permanent Commission (SouthPa;South Pacific
Plata River;Rio de la Plata;Watercourses
should it be Taiwan (says Repub of China, but HQ in Taipei)?
maybe 1 (says rights but not specifically int'l agr rights); some of them signed late (see word file), more sigs on final act, some ctys seem to have reservation without signature??
Charters-Constitutions-Statute;Kagera River;Org. for the man. and dev. of;Water resources
EEC+12 (but no EEC members among 12, so ok)
Conv/Prot separate in IEA but same date/party/UNTS
not in UNTS/10 founders but 4 signatures (can't find original)??
different for the Final Act; clearly wrong issue because not in Africa
on basis of ILO const; see ILO membership data
is French Protectorate of Morocco and Tunisia independent?/could be transport
doesn’t require action, just establishing cmte
war cemeteries not really security issue
different # listed in title and list of sgnatories; also unclear how to deal with colonies
40 for the Convention but 39 for the Protocol
FAO no sigs/should it be health? and is this private sector?
if insurance is public benefit in these countries
also include UK/could be OtherEcon(tax)/is it limited?
FinalAct and Convention have different parties
ECSC High Authority is a signatory/2 commodities = multiple
10 ratifications/accession but signatures drawn from amend protocol (4355)
not listed...is it independent?/only one issue but not trade
amendment?  Also, should be tacked onto the original agreement so not clear whether to count as separate articles
should be security, but not listed in UNTS code
is it econ?/is it multisectoral?/is it limited?
Austria and Lux also agree in Preamble/is it limited?
doesn’t require action, just establishing cmte, but keep it in b/c creates rights
US and EEC…is that bilateral?; review code
one signature was later/Eastern Europe/1or1.5?
different number for final act (53/51) and actual convention (29/27)…inclined to stick with 27 b/c convention is where code comes from; also less articles in final act (14), but stick with convention (23)
multiple issues/all europe but bilateral in nature/single sector
1966 but sigs open 1965?/Belgium on behalf of BLEU
counts EEC as 1 signature b/c EEC is treated here as one country
all in Europe but really bilateral in nature
military, but about cemetary maintenance
passports = new category?/region bilateral-ish
is oil just one sector or cover anything shipped?
85 if blank lines count, but Final Act lists 19??
3 letters + memorandum w/ 11 paragraphs of details
only stick with Protocol I, which may possibly be viewed as amdt; not officially Europe but by default
development and investment/is it limited?
reservation/declaration from at least one nonsignatory
review code because 3 is only in preamble; otherwise 2
are Suriname and Netherlands Antilles independent? i think no
different parties for Convention and Final Act (ie, maybe 28)/not really Econ?
4 sigs more than a year later/could be DomestLaw
parties from amendment protocol (14151)/Narcotics
includes EEC and members/could be OtherIss(customs)
Spain/Italy mentioned as partic but no sig = 11?
different combos on each part/could be OtherEcon, but it's about rules for the IO
2 signatures more than a year later/could be Labour
just an agreement to add Colombia to an existing agreement
could be transport since it is transport of animals/maybe accession?
was the main agreement supposed to be here?
no signatures listed, only ratifications; just research?
EEC + 6; pvt/pub research?; just Europe cmty?
EEC+1/no indicator of SciRsrch but it is
check whether Article 7 is really 2.5; CoEur auspices but seems to be broader
only UNESCO officials listed…see vol1649p184; only for public educ?; don't have parties info
may be 0 or 2; only 6 signatories (with signers noted)?
just a succession agreement (Czech Repub replaces Czechoslovakia)
different sigs on declaration/decision (& no list on actual treaty) CIS = Europe?; all @ upholding previous IL
EEC and its members are counted b/c separate competencies; assume blank lines don't count
based on breadth of SPS applicability (or should it be 2.5 b/c only stds?); parties incl EEC and memb. states, as well as non-GATT members (more listed later); what's primary, and READ REST
only deals with the institutional structure
only 5 within the first year + 3 with no date
communique implementing previous treaty/not all parties recognized as states